{
    "ok": true,
    "schema": "berean-interpretation-development-api-v1",
    "release": "v56",
    "model": {
        "schema": "berean-interpretation-development-taxonomy-v1",
        "release": "v56",
        "title": "Interpretation Dependency & Development Timeline",
        "purpose": "Expose the premises an interpretation depends on, how strongly each premise is documented, and how comparable readings change across the Archive's curated reception corpus without confusing the oldest currently loaded witness with the historical origin of an idea.",
        "premise_types": [
            {
                "id": "DIRECT_TEXTUAL_DATA",
                "label": "Direct textual data",
                "description": "Explicit wording, grammar, narrative action, or directly observable discourse data in the Scripture text."
            },
            {
                "id": "LITERARY_INFERENCE",
                "label": "Literary inference",
                "description": "A proposed structural, rhetorical, narrative, or discourse relationship inferred from directly observable text."
            },
            {
                "id": "HISTORICAL_CONTEXT_MODEL",
                "label": "Historical/context model",
                "description": "A reconstruction or model brought to the passage from external historical/cultural evidence."
            },
            {
                "id": "SOCIAL_SCIENTIFIC_MODEL",
                "label": "Social-scientific model",
                "description": "A modern analytical model such as collectivism or honor/shame used to interpret ancient social behavior."
            },
            {
                "id": "INTERTEXTUAL_INFERENCE",
                "label": "Intertextual inference",
                "description": "A claimed echo, thematic relationship, or dependency between texts beyond an explicit quotation/citation."
            },
            {
                "id": "TYPOLOGICAL_EXPANSION",
                "label": "Typological expansion",
                "description": "A move from the immediate narrative referent to a broader symbolic, corporate, salvation-historical, or typological identification."
            },
            {
                "id": "ALLEGORICAL_CORRESPONDENCE",
                "label": "Allegorical correspondence",
                "description": "A proposed symbolic one-to-one or multi-part mapping not explicitly supplied by the passage."
            },
            {
                "id": "LATER_DOCTRINAL_PREMISE",
                "label": "Later doctrinal premise",
                "description": "A theological premise historically formulated outside the passage and required to reach the interpretation."
            },
            {
                "id": "TRADITIONAL_AUTHORITY_PREMISE",
                "label": "Traditional authority premise",
                "description": "An appeal to interpreter, institution, tradition, office, age, or reception as a reason the interpretation should be accepted."
            },
            {
                "id": "RECEPTION_APPLICATION",
                "label": "Reception/application premise",
                "description": "A documented historical use or application of the passage that is evidence for reception history, not automatically for original meaning."
            }
        ],
        "support_states": [
            {
                "id": "DIRECTLY_DEMONSTRATED",
                "label": "Directly demonstrated"
            },
            {
                "id": "STRONGLY_SUPPORTED",
                "label": "Strongly supported"
            },
            {
                "id": "REASONABLE_INFERENCE",
                "label": "Reasonable inference"
            },
            {
                "id": "MODEL_DEPENDENT",
                "label": "Model-dependent"
            },
            {
                "id": "DISPUTED",
                "label": "Disputed"
            },
            {
                "id": "NOT_DEMONSTRATED_BY_PASSAGE",
                "label": "Not demonstrated by passage"
            },
            {
                "id": "RECEPTION_ONLY",
                "label": "Reception only"
            },
            {
                "id": "REJECTED_AS_AUTHORITY_SHORTCUT",
                "label": "Rejected as authority shortcut"
            }
        ],
        "dependency_assessments": [
            {
                "id": "TEXT_ROOTED_MINIMAL_INFERENCE",
                "label": "Text-rooted; minimal inference"
            },
            {
                "id": "TEXT_ROOTED_WITH_LITERARY_MODEL",
                "label": "Text-rooted with literary model"
            },
            {
                "id": "CONTEXT_MODEL_DEPENDENT",
                "label": "Context/model-dependent"
            },
            {
                "id": "DISPUTED_WEIGHTING_OF_TEXTUAL_DATA",
                "label": "Disputed weighting of textual data"
            },
            {
                "id": "TYPOLOGICAL_OR_ALLEGORICAL_EXTENSION",
                "label": "Typological/allegorical extension"
            },
            {
                "id": "RECEPTION_HISTORY_ONLY",
                "label": "Reception history only"
            }
        ],
        "chronology_states": [
            {
                "id": "EARLIEST_IN_CURATED_CORPUS_ONLY",
                "label": "Earliest in curated corpus only",
                "description": "The earliest currently curated witness known to this Archive dataset. It is not a claim that the view originated there."
            },
            {
                "id": "RELATED_PRECEDENT_IN_CURATED_CORPUS",
                "label": "Related precedent in curated corpus",
                "description": "A historically earlier record shares part of the reasoning but is not necessarily the same interpretation."
            },
            {
                "id": "NO_EARLIER_CURATED_WITNESS",
                "label": "No earlier curated witness",
                "description": "No earlier witness is currently curated; absence from this corpus is not evidence of historical absence."
            },
            {
                "id": "HISTORICAL_ORIGIN_UNKNOWN",
                "label": "Historical origin unknown",
                "description": "The Archive does not claim an origin date without dedicated source research."
            }
        ],
        "development_relations": [
            "CONTINUITY",
            "REFINEMENT",
            "EXPANSION",
            "NARROWING",
            "CONTRADICTION",
            "RELATED_APPLICATION",
            "INDEPENDENT_PROPOSAL",
            "CURRENT_SYNTHESIS"
        ],
        "hard_boundaries": [
            "'Earliest in the curated Archive corpus' must never be rendered as 'first in history' or 'originated with'.",
            "Absence of an interpretation or premise from the current dataset is not evidence that it did not exist earlier.",
            "A premise can be historically old and still be textually weak; chronology does not increase truth weight.",
            "A premise can be modern and still be strong if the evidence supports it; novelty does not decrease truth weight by itself.",
            "Interpreter, denomination, office, fame, spiritual claim, or institutional authority never satisfies a missing premise.",
            "Reception-history records may document development but cannot self-promote into original-meaning claims.",
            "Dependency profiles describe how an argument works; they do not imply that every interpreter consciously formulated each premise in the Archive's analytical vocabulary.",
            "Do not infer a development relationship merely from topical similarity; curated threads require explicit comparative review."
        ]
    },
    "evidence_boundary": "Development chronology is scoped to the Codex's curated corpus. 'Earliest curated witness' is not a historical-origin claim, and dependency profiles do not add evidence weight."
}