{
    "ok": true,
    "schema": "berean-interpretation-history-api-v1",
    "release": "v53",
    "model": {
        "schema": "berean-interpretation-history-taxonomy-v1",
        "release": "v53",
        "title": "History of Interpretation / Attribution Chain foundation",
        "purpose": "Normalize interpreters, traditions or method families, works, and historically documented interpretation records without treating age, fame, office, or denominational identity as evidence that an interpretation is true.",
        "entity_types": [
            {
                "id": "INTERPRETER",
                "label": "Interpreter",
                "description": "A named person responsible for a work or documented interpretation. Identity does not confer evidentiary rank."
            },
            {
                "id": "INTERPRETIVE_TRADITION",
                "label": "Tradition / method family",
                "description": "A historical tradition or scholarly method used for navigation and context, not an authority score."
            },
            {
                "id": "INTERPRETIVE_WORK",
                "label": "Interpretive work",
                "description": "A work in which an interpretation is documented; the work remains separate from the provenance SOURCE record that describes the edition or access point."
            },
            {
                "id": "INTERPRETATION_HISTORY_RECORD",
                "label": "History-of-interpretation record",
                "description": "A passage-specific record documenting what an interpreter argued or how a passage was used in a particular work and historical setting."
            }
        ],
        "historical_documentation_states": [
            {
                "id": "DIRECT_PRIMARY_SOURCE",
                "label": "Direct primary source",
                "description": "The interpretation is documented in the interpreter's own work in the language/edition being cited."
            },
            {
                "id": "PRIMARY_SOURCE_VIA_TRANSLATION",
                "label": "Primary source via translation",
                "description": "The interpretation is documented in the interpreter's own work through an identified translation."
            },
            {
                "id": "SECONDARY_REPORT",
                "label": "Secondary report",
                "description": "The position is reported by later scholarship; primary verification remains desirable."
            },
            {
                "id": "REPORTED_PENDING_VERIFICATION",
                "label": "Reported pending verification",
                "description": "A lead exists but the underlying work has not yet been verified."
            }
        ],
        "chronology_rule": "Timeline order is descriptive only. Earlier does not mean more original, and later does not mean more informed.",
        "authority_rule": "No interpreter, tradition, office, denomination, academy, popularity measure, or age of a view supplies truth weight by itself.",
        "work_source_separation": "INTERPRETIVE_WORK is a research entity describing the intellectual work; SOURCE is the provenance/rights/access endpoint for the edition or record used by the Archive.",
        "strongest_version_rule": "Historical positions should be represented from their own serious formulations and evidence before criticism.",
        "assessment_rule": "The fact that an interpretation was historically held can be documented with high confidence while the interpretation itself remains separately assessable and revisable.",
        "hard_boundaries": [
            "A history-of-interpretation record documents a reading; it does not promote that reading into Scripture text or historical fact.",
            "Tradition labels are navigation/context metadata, not evidence rankings.",
            "Primary-source documentation establishes what an interpreter wrote, not that the interpretation is correct.",
            "SOURCE records remain provenance endpoints and are never used as evidence-graph bridges.",
            "Later Archive synthesis may agree or disagree with a historical interpreter, but the historical record must not be rewritten to match the synthesis."
        ],
        "extensions": [
            {
                "release": "v54",
                "title": "Reception-history expansion + faceted timeline",
                "features": [
                    "era_bucket metadata",
                    "server-rendered era/tradition filters",
                    "historical disagreement preserved explicitly",
                    "translation-chain provenance boundary for patristic witnesses"
                ]
            },
            {
                "release": "v55",
                "title": "Interpretive evidence audit gate",
                "features": [
                    "each current Luke 15 reception record has a DOCUMENTED_RECEPTION_ONLY audit",
                    "historical documentation does not self-promote into original-meaning confidence",
                    "promotion to a current interpretive claim requires a separate evidence audit"
                ]
            }
        ],
        "faceting_rule": "Era and tradition filters are navigation aids only; filtering never changes evidentiary confidence or authority.",
        "disagreement_rule": "When historical interpreters disagree, preserve the disagreement in their strongest documented form rather than harmonizing the timeline."
    },
    "evidence_boundary": "Interpreter, tradition/method, work, provenance SOURCE, and passage-specific interpretation records remain separate. Historical precedence does not create evidentiary authority."
}