INTERPRETATION_DEPENDENCY_PROFILE
DEP_INT_MAT_16_ROMAN_SUCCESSIONContext Model Dependent
Profiled target: Identifying the continuing Petrine office specifically with the bishops of Rome requires another premise
Argument-dependency analysis for the Matthew 16 doctrine stress test. The profile cannot increase evidentiary weight.
Premises
Later Doctrinal Premise · Disputed · Prerequisite
A continuing Petrine office exists.
Premise P1
Historical Context Model · Disputed · Core Bridge
The continuing Petrine office is uniquely located in the Roman episcopal succession.
Premise P2
Dependency chain
A continuing Petrine office exists.
The continuing Petrine office is uniquely located in the Roman episcopal succession.
Curated chronology
State: HISTORICAL_ORIGIN_UNKNOWN
Date Label: v57 curated corpus
Date Sort Key: 9999
Note: This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Not an origin claim: this records the earliest currently curated witness relevant to the profile, not the first historical occurrence.
Development threads: THREAD_MAT_16_PETRINE_TO_PAPAL_CHAIN, THREAD_MAT_16_ROCK_RECEPTION_DIVERSITY
What this profile does not establish
That Peter was not in Rome.
That Roman succession has no early evidence.
That a Roman succession line, if established, automatically proves universal jurisdiction.
What this does not establish
That Peter was not in Rome.
That Roman succession has no early evidence.
That a Roman succession line, if established, automatically proves universal jurisdiction.
- Release Introduced
- v57
- Passage Id
- PASSAGE_MAT_16_13_20
- Status
- CURATED_PUBLIC