The Berean Codex™Scripture Research Project
Research library · Reception history · Dependency analysis

Origen — the promise can extend to disciples who confess as Peter did

A reusable research record with provenance and relationships kept separate from the presentation layer.

INTERPRETATION_HISTORY_RECORDHISTINT_MAT_16_ORIGEN_XII

Evidence state: documented historical interpretation

Statement layerScholar argues
Historical attribution chain

c. 248 CE · Patristic · Primary Source Via Translation

Interpreter: Origen

Work: Origen — Commentary on Matthew, Book XII

Tradition / method: Greek patristic / Alexandrian interpretation

Historically documented reading

Origen treats Peter as the immediate blessed confessor but argues that disciples who confess Christ in the same divinely revealed way may likewise become “Peter/rock” figures; he explicitly questions restricting the church-building and keys language to Peter alone.

Interpretive use: This is early reception evidence for a non-exclusive extension of Petrine language; it is not proof that Matthew intended every later ecclesial office to possess identical authority.

Original context: History-of-interpretation evidence only. This record documents a reading and its context; it does not gain original-meaning authority from age or reputation.

Authority boundary: A primary source can establish what this interpreter wrote; it does not make the interpretation correct by age, fame, office, or tradition.
Interpretive Evidence Audit

Documented Reception Only · Curated Pass As Reception History

Inference depth: Direct · Original-meaning weight: No Automatic Original Meaning Weight

Publish as documented reception history only; evaluate the reading independently if used as a current interpretive claim.

Open complete evidence audit

Quality-gate boundary: This audit measures evidentiary support and inferential distance. It does not make the Codex infallible or convert scholar/tradition authority into evidence.
Interpretation Dependency Profile

Reception History Only

Premises mapped: 2 · Development threads: 1

Curated chronology: c. 248 CE · Earliest In Curated Corpus Only

This is a curated reception witness and not a claim that the interpretation originated here.

Open complete dependency profile

Chronology boundary: “Earliest in the curated Codex corpus” is not a claim of historical origin. Missing earlier records cannot be treated as evidence that a premise did not exist.

Supporting evidence

Work Id: WORK_ORIGEN_COMMENTARY_MATTHEW_XII

Role: primary historical interpretation witness

What this does not establish

That this interpreter originated the reading.
That the reading is correct because it is early, famous, orthodox, Reformed, or influential.
That later doctrinal structures can be read back into Matthew 16 without separately supporting each dependency.
Release Introduced
v57
Passage Id
PASSAGE_MAT_16_13_20
Evidence Classification
documented historical interpretation
Status
CURATED_PUBLIC