The Berean Codex™Scripture Research Project
Research library · Reception history · Dependency analysis

Evidence audit — Matthew 16:18 — πέτρος / πέτρα are deliberately related in the Greek sentence

A reusable research record with provenance and relationships kept separate from the presentation layer.

INTERPRETATION_AUDITAUDIT_INT_MAT_16_PETROS_PETRA
Interpretation Dependency Profile

Text Rooted Minimal Inference

Premises mapped: 2 · Development threads: 2

Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown

This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.

Open complete dependency profile

Chronology boundary: “Earliest in the curated Codex corpus” is not a claim of historical origin. Missing earlier records cannot be treated as evidence that a premise did not exist.
Interpretive Evidence Audit

Textually Demonstrable · Curated Pass

Audited target: Matthew 16:18 — πέτρος / πέτρα are deliberately related in the Greek sentence

Inference depth: Direct

Original-meaning weight: Textually Demonstrable

Support review

Textual: {"rating":"REVIEWED","notes":["Direct Matthew 16 wording was separated from added premises."]}

Linguistic: {"rating":"REVIEWED_WHERE_RELEVANT","notes":["Greek claims are limited to demonstrable lexical/grammatical observations; no Aramaic reconstruction is treated as extant wording."]}

Historical Context: {"rating":"SEPARATE_LAYER","notes":["Later doctrinal and patristic evidence is used as reception/development evidence unless independently relevant to original context."]}

Dependencies

Type: NONE_MATERIAL

Note: See the v57 dependency profile for explicit premise-by-premise analysis.

Inferential steps

Matthew 16:18 juxtaposes Πέτρος and πέτρα in deliberate wordplay.
The wordplay alone identifies one exclusive referent and later office.

Counterevidence review

Patristic and later interpreters demonstrably drew different referential conclusions from the same wording.

Strongest competing case

See linked serious Catholic, Orthodox, Reformed, and patristic formulations where relevant; direct-text claims are not overridden by those labels.

Audit conclusion

Publish with the stated classification and boundaries. Reception records remain separate from original-meaning evidence, and later doctrinal arrows remain visible rather than being folded into Matthew 16.

What this audit does not establish

The morphology alone does not prove or disprove papal succession.
The Greek wordplay does not authorize importing later offices into the verse.

What this does not establish

The morphology alone does not prove or disprove papal succession.
The Greek wordplay does not authorize importing later offices into the verse.
Release Introduced
v57
Status
CURATED_PUBLIC