The Berean Codex™Scripture Research Project
Research library · Reception history · Dependency analysis

Matthew 16:18 — πέτρος / πέτρα are deliberately related in the Greek sentence

A reusable research record with provenance and relationships kept separate from the presentation layer.

INTERPRETIVE_CLAIMINT_MAT_16_PETROS_PETRA

Evidence state: textually demonstrable

Statement layerBerean synthesis
ConfidenceHigh
Curation stateCurated Human Reviewed
Claim

Matthew’s Greek explicitly places Πέτρος (Peter) and πέτρα (rock) in a wordplay/cognate relationship. The grammatical gender difference is real, but by itself it does not settle whether the rock’s referent is Peter personally, Peter as confessor/representative, his confession, Christ, or a composite reading.

Interpretive Evidence Audit

Textually Demonstrable · Curated Pass

Inference depth: Direct · Original-meaning weight: Textually Demonstrable

Publish with the stated classification and boundaries. Reception records remain separate from original-meaning evidence, and later doctrinal arrows remain visible rather than being folded into Matthew 16.

Open complete evidence audit

Quality-gate boundary: This audit measures evidentiary support and inferential distance. It does not make the Codex infallible or convert scholar/tradition authority into evidence.
Interpretation Dependency Profile

Text Rooted Minimal Inference

Premises mapped: 2 · Development threads: 2

Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown

This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.

Open complete dependency profile

Chronology boundary: “Earliest in the curated Codex corpus” is not a claim of historical origin. Missing earlier records cannot be treated as evidence that a premise did not exist.

Supporting evidence

Id: PASSAGE_MAT_16_13_20

Role: direct Greek wording

Counterevidence / challenges

Note: Patristic and later interpreters demonstrably drew different referential conclusions from the same wording.

What this does not establish

The morphology alone does not prove or disprove papal succession.
The Greek wordplay does not authorize importing later offices into the verse.
Release Introduced
v57
Passage Id
PASSAGE_MAT_16_13_20
Evidence Classification
textually demonstrable
Status
CURATED_PUBLIC