Context Model Dependent
A continuing Petrine office is an added premise beyond Matthew 16 itself
Evidence audit: Tradition Dependent · Curated Pass With Limits
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedPeter receives a real commission.
Later Doctrinal Premise · DisputedThe Petrine commission is a permanent office transmissible after Peter’s death.
Historical Context Model · Model DependentHistorical succession evidence establishes continuity of that specific office.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Reception History Only
Early patristic reception is materially diverse and cannot be reduced to a single later denominational formula
Evidence audit: Documented Reception Only · Curated Pass As Reception History
Reception Application · Reception OnlyThe curated patristic sources document materially different emphases.
Traditional Authority Premise · Rejected As Authority ShortcutCounting or antiquity of fathers decides original meaning.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Context Model Dependent
Identifying the continuing Petrine office specifically with the bishops of Rome requires another premise
Evidence audit: Tradition Dependent · Curated Pass With Limits
Later Doctrinal Premise · DisputedA continuing Petrine office exists.
Historical Context Model · DisputedThe continuing Petrine office is uniquely located in the Roman episcopal succession.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Text Rooted Minimal Inference
Matthew 16:16–19 — Peter has a real and distinctive immediate narrative role
Evidence audit: Textually Demonstrable · Curated Pass
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedPeter confesses Jesus and receives a personal blessing and promises in vv. 17–19.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Disputed Weighting Of Textual Data
Matthew 16:18 — the precise referent of “this rock” remains seriously disputed
Evidence audit: Disputed · Curated Pass With Limits
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedPeter is the immediate singular addressee.
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedThe sentence links Peter and rock lexically.
Literary Inference · DisputedThe exact referent must be Peter alone, confession alone, Christ alone, or another exclusive option.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Text Rooted Minimal Inference
Matthew 16:18 — πέτρος / πέτρα are deliberately related in the Greek sentence
Evidence audit: Textually Demonstrable · Curated Pass
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedMatthew 16:18 juxtaposes Πέτρος and πέτρα in deliberate wordplay.
Literary Inference · Not Demonstrated By PassageThe wordplay alone identifies one exclusive referent and later office.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Context Model Dependent
Matthew 16:18 — ἐκκλησία denotes Jesus’ assembly/community without specifying the later hierarchy
Evidence audit: Strongly Contextual · Curated Pass With Limits
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedJesus says “my ekklēsia.”
Historical Context Model · Strongly SupportedThe noun’s wider Greek range includes assembly/community usage beyond a later technical hierarchy.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Text Rooted Minimal Inference
Matthew 16:18 — “gates of Hades” promises that death/Hades will not prevail, but the mechanism is not fully specified
Evidence audit: Reasonable Interpretation · Curated Pass With Limits
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedThe gates of Hades are said not to prevail against the church.
Intertextual Inference · Not Demonstrated By PassageThe metaphor must equal a specific later doctrine of institutional indefectibility.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Text Rooted Minimal Inference
Matthew 16:18–19 does not explicitly state a succession mechanism
Evidence audit: Textually Demonstrable · Curated Pass
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedMatthew 16:13–20 names no successor, transmission rite, Roman see, or post-Petrine office.
Later Doctrinal Premise · Not Demonstrated By PassageNo explicit succession in this passage means succession is impossible from all other evidence.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Text Rooted Minimal Inference
Matthew 16:19 — binding and loosing are promised to Peter in the singular
Evidence audit: Textually Demonstrable · Curated Pass
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedPeter is promised binding and loosing authority in Matthew 16:19.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Text Rooted Minimal Inference
Matthew 16:19 — the keys are explicitly given to Peter
Evidence audit: Textually Demonstrable · Curated Pass
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedThe keys of the kingdom are promised to Peter in the singular.
Later Doctrinal Premise · Not Demonstrated By PassageThe keys are automatically hereditary and uniquely Roman.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Text Rooted Minimal Inference
Matthew 18:18 — binding and loosing are also addressed to the disciple community
Evidence audit: Textually Demonstrable · Curated Pass
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedMatthew 18:18 addresses binding and loosing in the plural.
Literary Inference · Not Demonstrated By PassageShared binding/loosing erases every distinctive feature of Peter’s commission.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Disputed Weighting Of Textual Data
Peter’s authority in Matthew 16 is distinctive, but whether it is unique, representative, or shared is a compound question
Evidence audit: Disputed · Curated Pass With Limits
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedPeter receives keys and singular address.
Direct Textual Data · Directly DemonstratedBinding/loosing also appears in plural in Matthew 18.
Literary Inference · DisputedThese data establish either exclusive supremacy or complete non-distinctiveness.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Context Model Dependent
Roman Petrine succession does not by itself establish universal jurisdiction over all bishops
Evidence audit: Later Development · Curated Pass With Limits
Later Doctrinal Premise · DisputedThe bishop of Rome uniquely succeeds to Peter’s Petrine office.
Later Doctrinal Premise · DisputedThat succession entails jurisdiction over every bishop and local church.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Reception History Only
Strong Catholic formulation — Peter receives a divinely instituted primacy perpetuated in the Roman pontiffs
Evidence audit: Documented Reception Only · Curated Pass As Reception History
Reception Application · Reception OnlyVatican I explicitly formulates the Petrine → perpetual successor → Roman pontiff → universal jurisdiction chain.
Traditional Authority Premise · Rejected As Authority ShortcutVatican I’s authority by itself proves every exegetical premise.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Reception History Only
Strong Orthodox formulation represented in v57 — primacy exists, but universal primacy is not universal governing jurisdiction
Evidence audit: Documented Reception Only · Curated Pass As Reception History
Reception Application · Reception OnlyThe Moscow Patriarchate explicitly affirms universal primacy of honor and rejects universal governing jurisdiction.
Traditional Authority Premise · Rejected As Authority ShortcutThis one Orthodox synod speaks exhaustively for all Orthodox reasoning.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Reception History Only
Strong Reformed formulation represented in v57 — Christ is the Church’s sole head; Petrine language does not establish papal headship
Evidence audit: Documented Reception Only · Curated Pass As Reception History
Reception Application · Reception OnlyCalvin and the Westminster tradition document a confession/Christ-centered and anti-papal-headship formulation.
Traditional Authority Premise · Rejected As Authority ShortcutReformation provenance itself proves the reading.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Context Model Dependent
Universal papal supremacy is the end of a multi-step dependency chain, not a sentence directly stated in Matthew 16
Evidence audit: Later Development · Curated Pass With Limits
Later Doctrinal Premise · DisputedPetrine office continues.
Later Doctrinal Premise · DisputedRoman bishops uniquely inherit it.
Later Doctrinal Premise · DisputedThe inherited office has supreme, full, immediate, universal jurisdiction.
Curated chronology: v57 curated corpus · Historical Origin Unknown
This profile distinguishes the current Archive evidence chain from historical origin. The earliest loaded witness is not a claim that the idea originated there.
Open complete dependency profile →
Reception History Only
Augustine — Christ/confession as rock; Peter represents the Church
Evidence audit: Documented Reception Only · Curated Pass As Reception History
Reception Application · Reception OnlyThe cited primary historical work documents this interpreter’s Matthew 16 reading.
Traditional Authority Premise · Rejected As Authority ShortcutThe interpreter’s age, office, fame, or tradition proves the reading correct.
Curated chronology: c. 416 CE · Earliest In Curated Corpus Only
This is a curated reception witness and not a claim that the interpretation originated here.
Open complete dependency profile →
Reception History Only
Calvin — confession/faith as the Church’s shared foundation
Evidence audit: Documented Reception Only · Curated Pass As Reception History
Reception Application · Reception OnlyThe cited primary historical work documents this interpreter’s Matthew 16 reading.
Traditional Authority Premise · Rejected As Authority ShortcutThe interpreter’s age, office, fame, or tradition proves the reading correct.
Curated chronology: 16th century · Earliest In Curated Corpus Only
This is a curated reception witness and not a claim that the interpretation originated here.
Open complete dependency profile →
Reception History Only
Chrysostom — rock as the faith of Peter’s confession
Evidence audit: Documented Reception Only · Curated Pass As Reception History
Reception Application · Reception OnlyThe cited primary historical work documents this interpreter’s Matthew 16 reading.
Traditional Authority Premise · Rejected As Authority ShortcutThe interpreter’s age, office, fame, or tradition proves the reading correct.
Curated chronology: c. 390 CE · Earliest In Curated Corpus Only
This is a curated reception witness and not a claim that the interpretation originated here.
Open complete dependency profile →
Reception History Only
Cyprian — Peter as visible starting-point of unity with equal apostolic partnership
Evidence audit: Documented Reception Only · Curated Pass As Reception History
Reception Application · Reception OnlyThe cited primary historical work documents this interpreter’s Matthew 16 reading.
Traditional Authority Premise · Rejected As Authority ShortcutThe interpreter’s age, office, fame, or tradition proves the reading correct.
Curated chronology: c. 251 CE · Earliest In Curated Corpus Only
This is a curated reception witness and not a claim that the interpretation originated here.
Open complete dependency profile →
Reception History Only
Origen — the promise can extend to disciples who confess as Peter did
Evidence audit: Documented Reception Only · Curated Pass As Reception History
Reception Application · Reception OnlyThe cited primary historical work documents this interpreter’s Matthew 16 reading.
Traditional Authority Premise · Rejected As Authority ShortcutThe interpreter’s age, office, fame, or tradition proves the reading correct.
Curated chronology: c. 248 CE · Earliest In Curated Corpus Only
This is a curated reception witness and not a claim that the interpretation originated here.
Open complete dependency profile →